On 7 December 2004, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the Court) declared inadmissible the complaints in the cases "Lidija KUHAREC against Latvia", where the applicant complained of possible violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter – the Convention) and "Juta MENTZEN alias MENCENA against Latvia", where the applicant complained of possible violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the Convention.

The complaint in the case "Aleksandrs IVANOVS against Latvia" was submitted about the possible violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the Convention. On 25 March 2004, the Court declared inadmissible the complaint.

On 29 January 2004, the Court declared inadmissible the complaint in the case "Aleksandrs KOLOSOVSKIS against Latvia", where the applicant complained of possible violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 12 (right to marry) of the Convention.

On 9 October 2003, the Court declared inadmissible the complaint in the case "Marija KANS and others against Latvia", where the applicant complained of possible violation of Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (protection of property).

On 25 September 2003 and on 21 October 2004, the Court excluded the complaints in the cases "Elshan Khanoglan-ogly AGAYEV against Latvia" and "Ivars KRUPSS against Latvia" respectively.

On 3 April 2003, the Court declared inadmissible the complaint in the case "Inna HARLANOVA against Latvia", where the applicant complained of possible violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the Convention.

 Previously, on 12 September 2002, the Court had declared inadmissible the complaint in the case "Tatjana MIHEJEVA against Latvia", where the applicant complained of possible violation of Article 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) and Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as Article 2 (freedom of movement) and Article 3 (prohibition of expulsion of nationals) of Fourth Protocol to Convention.

 On 6 June 2002, the Court had declared inadmissible the complaints in the cases "Vladimirs KIKOTS, Olga KIKOTA against Latvia" and "Agnese LASMANE against Latvia".

The complaint in the case "Vladimirs KIKOTS, Olga KIKOTA against Latvia" was submitted about the possible violation of Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the right to respect for private and family life) and of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), but in the case "Agnese LASMANE against Latvia" – about the possible violation of Article 6.

 On 13 June 2002, the Court had declared inadmissible the complaint in the case "Larisa RUDOVA against Latvia", where the person complained about the possible violation of Article 6 of the Convention.

 Previously, the Court declared inadmissible the complaints in the cases "Edgars DZERINS against Latvia" and "Georgijs KOZLOVS against Latvia". Both of the complaints were submitted about the possible violations of Article 6 of the Convention.

 Before making all the decisions, the Court met the applicant and became acquainted with the commentaries of the cases submitted by the Government of Latvia.

 The decisions of the European Court of Human Rights can be found on the homepage of the European Court of Human Rights – http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/. The decisions of the Court on the inadmissibility of complaints that are made without requesting the Government of Latvia to give its commentaries can also be found on the homepage noted above.

 The criteria for the decisions of the Court on the inadmissibility of the complaints are enumerated on the web site "Consideration of complaints at the European Court of Human Rights".